How Managers Give Heroics a Bad Name

From time to time, every organization has to face tough, emerging challenges. They can be market-imposed, like a new regulation that changes the way you need to operate; self-imposed, like a fixed ship date for a product you’ve never made before; or required by circumstance, like a new enterprise system installation that goes awry.

The Hero Saves the Day

Any of these situations seems to call for management heroics — working round the clock, holding countless meetings (often accompanied by pizza), scribbling tremendous numbers of Post-Its, whiteboarding frantically, and texting-texting-texting on both small details and large panic points.

Some managers are quite proud of their ability to do “heroics” when necessary. But if you pay close attention, you’ll find that some of those managers are more inclined to heroics than others, and they’re apt to give very different reasons for engaging in it:

  • “We’re facing a serious situation, and I’m afraid the business will be damaged. I choose to step up even though it may cost me dearly. Someone has to save the day!
  • “When I do heroics, it’s for my boss, to show how much I care about him. He’s been complaining about what needs to be done, and nobody seems to be doing anything about it. I want him to know I was the one who saved the day.”
  • “I’m actually the only one who can fix this problem because of my particular skills, position, or fill-in- the-blank, so I must step up. It would be a moral failure not to. And it’s a thrill to be the one to save the day.”
  • “I can do this better — more skillfully and with more flair — than the people who are supposed to do it. I don’t like having to be part of a whole task force that works this stuff out. I’m saving my own day.”
  • “I just like being the go-to. It’s fun to be a hero.”

The Perils of the Hero Complex

The interesting thing about heroics, though is that, reframed, it could be a version of martyrdom or doormat syndrome. The martyr manager thinks: “I’m the only one who can get this done, take on that difficult person, etc., and absorb the most stress and pain for the sake of my organization or leader.” But rather than asking, “Do you see what I’ve done for you?” this manager asks, “Do you see how much I’m willing to suffer for you?” Unfortunately, neither approach is productive in the long term.

Sometimes projects don’t come together as expected, and people really do need to go above and beyond to close the gap. But are heroics ever really necessary? On an individual basis, heroics can be a way to break through procrastination, albeit, sometimes in an unhealthy way. (See The Grappling Hook Method of Project Management.) But extreme measures have a cost, even if they do successfully bridge the gap, resolve the problem, or cover the loss.

Some organizations rely too heavily on heroics because it’s not acceptable to talk about the true terrain, the real circumstances, or the stumbling blocks that keep people from working in more mundane, but also more reasonable or more structured ways. Sometimes an organization’s environment breeds excitement junkies.

Heroes in the Making

If your organization depends on tremendous intensity or derring-do to get the work done, or if your people are complaining of exhaustion because of their heroics, it’s time to find a different approach to the work. And to the people.

Even in the face of overly aggressive project deadlines, collective efforts can be structured to bring the initiative to its best conclusion, and then applied to adjust the conditions so the team doesn’t have to live through the same struggle again. It’s a leadership responsibility to explain why it’s not productive when employees burn themselves out by throwing themselves against a problem — and then to ensure that heroics aren’t necessary in the future.

Expanding the skills and capacities of others, bringing everyone along, confronting organizational roadblocks, and recognizing all efforts will be more successful — and much more heroic — than just leading a particular charge up a particular hill.

Onward and upward,


You might also like:

20 Questions for Leadership Success

What does it take to succeed as a new team leader, particularly in an environment where not every requirement or metric is already laid out and being performed by multiple people at the same level? Over the past couple of weeks I’ve had multiple inquiries on this subject, although from different angles. I’ve been asked […]

Read More

Service Efficiency vs. Customer (and Server) Comfort

Efficiency and comfort can sometimes be at odds. This divergence is often exacerbated by new technology, particularly in the service industry. Combine the drive for efficiency with technology and customers’ feelings about service providers — and vice versa — and comfort and satisfaction can be lost altogether. The Payment Plan I recently experienced the potential […]

Read More

Four Markers of the “Safe” Leader

When employees are not shut down or demotivated by fear, they’re able to absorb input and recommendations, learn and grow, share information and technique, and stretch to meet larger goals and aims. How can leaders create safety? Typically, safety starts when leaders demonstrate competence, openness, candor, and vision. Don’t for a minute think these are […]

Read More

5 Ways Non-Intervention Ruins Teams (and How to Intervene Yourself)

Many managers avoid giving critical feedback to subordinates or peers, and steer clear of criticizing their own managers. Despite the tremendous business relevance of candid criticism and the frequent requirement to provide it, any kind of fault-finding can feel personally uncomfortable and interpersonally risky. The very idea of giving feedback can be awkward and upsetting. […]

Read More